Prop. The correspondence h↦kerh between homomorphisms and maximal ideals is bijective.
证明. For a maximal ideal M, let π:A→A/M, and suppose that π(a) is not invertible in A/M. Note that M⊆ the ideal I=π−1(π(⟨a⟩))=π−1(⟨π(a)⟩), then M=I, hence π(⟨a⟩)=π(I)=0, so π(a)=0. Since σ(π(a)) is nonempty, π(a) is a number. Therefore h:A→A/M≃C is such a homo that kerh=M.
For a homo h, A/kerh≃C, so kerh is maximal.
□
Prop.σ(a)={h(a):h∈Δ}.
证明.a−h(a)∈kerh, so h(a)∈σ(a); for λ∈σ(a), a maximal ideal containing a−λ is of the form kerh, so h(a)=λ.
□
Prop. The kernel of Λ:A→C(Δ),a↦a^ is the intersection of all maximal ideals of A, and ∥a^∥∞=r(a).
证明. The former obvious, the latter by the former proposition.
□
Prop. Let A be a C∗ algebra.
(i)
∥a∥=∥a∗∥.
(ii)
For a∈ReA, ∥a∥=r(a).
(iii)
ρ:A→B is a ∗-homo, then ∥ρ(a)∥≤∥a∥. (Coro: ρ is ∗-iso implies isometry.)
(iv)
For unital abelian A and h:A→C, ∥h∥=1.
(v)
For a∈ReA, h(a)∈R. (Coro: h(a∗)=h(a).)
(vi)
If A is unital abelian, Λ:A→C(Δ) is a ∗-isomorphism.
□
证明.
(i)
∥a∥2=∥a∗a∥≤∥a∗∥∥a∥, and a∗∗=a.
(ii)
∥a∥2=∥a∗a∥=∥a2∥, so r(a)=n→∞lim∥a2n∥1/2n=∥a∥.
(iii)
By extending ρ when necessary, we can assume A is unital and ρ(1)=1. Note that σ(ρ(a))⊆σ(a), then ∥ρ(a)∥2=∥ρ(a∗a)∥=r(ρ(a∗a))≤r(a∗a)=∥a∗a∥=∥a∥2.
(iv)
If there is ∥a∥/h(a)<1, then exists b=(1−a/h(a))−1, and it follows that 1=h(b(1−a/h(a))=0.
(v)
Consider the abelian C∗ algebra generated by a+it and 1, where t∈R. Then ∣h(a+it)∣2≤∥a+it∥2=∥a2+t2∥≤∥a2∥+t2.Write h(a)=α+iβ, then ∣h(a+it)∣2=∣α∣2+(β+t)2, forcing β=0.
(vi)
When a∈ReA, ∥a^∥∞=r(a)=∥a∥. Hence for any a, ∥a^∥∞2=∥a^∗a^∥∞=∥a∗a∥∞=∥a∗a∥=∥a∥2. Moreover, as Λ(A) is a closed algebra separating points of Δ, Λ is surjective by Stone–Weierstrass.
□
Theo.
(i)
For a∈ReA, σ(a)⊆R.
(ii)
For two C∗ algebras B⊆A with common identity, σB(a)=σA(a).
证明.
(i)
If A is abelian, it follows from (v) of the preceding proposition. If A is not, nonetheless C∗(a) is abelian, then σA(a)⊆σC∗(a)(a)⊆R.
(ii)
When a∈ReB, σC∗(a)⊆R and ∂σC∗(a)(a)⊆∂σA(a) implies that σB(a)=σA(a). Now for a∈B, suppose that a is invertible in A, i.e. ax=xa=1, then (a∗a)(xx∗)=(xx∗)(a∗a)=1, where a∗a∈ReB and is thus invertible in B (as we have shown in the previous step that σB(a∗a)=σA(a∗a)), so xx∗∈B by the uniqueness of inverse, then x=(xx∗)a∗∈B.
□
Theo. Let ∥f∥E,∞=E(S)=0infx∈Ω∖Ssup∣f(x)∣, then π:L∞(Ω,E)→B(H),f↦∫fdEis an isometric C∗-homo.
Theo. If A is a C∗ algebra, a normal and f∈C(σ(a)), then σ(f(a))=f(σ(a)).
证明. The map f↦f(a) is a ∗-isomorphism from C(σ(a)) to C∗(a), so σ(f(a))=σC(σ(a))(f)=f(σ(a)).
□
Prop.φ∈A∗ is positive iff ∥φ∥=φ(1).
证明. For positive φ, ∥x∥≤1 implies x∗x≤1 and hence ∣φ(x)∣≤φ(1)1/2φ(x∗x)1/2≤φ(1).
For the converse, if A is abelian, φ can be seen as in the form C(X)→C,f↦∫Xfdμ. Then if ∥μ∥=μ(X), μ would have to be positive.
And if A is not abelian, for a∈A+ consider the abelian C∗(a), then φ∣C∗(a)(1)≤∥φ∣C∗(a)∥≤∥φ∥=φ(1)=φ∣C∗(a)(1),so φ∣C∗(a) is positive.
□
Prop.T⊂B(X) with σ(T)=F1∪F2, where F1,F2 are disjoint nonempty closed sets. Let G1,G2 be disjoint open sets containing F1,F2. Let Ei=χGi(T) and Xi=EiX.
(i) X=X1+X2, and ST=TS implies SXi⊂Xi;
(ii) let Ti=T∣Xi, then σ(Ti)=Fi;
(iii) let R:X1+X2→X1⊕X2, then R is invertible and RTR−1=T1⊕T2.
证明. (i) χGi∈Hol(T), so SEi=EiS, then SXi=SEiX=EiSX⊂EiX=Xi;
(ii) Let g(z)=(z−λ)−1 for some λ∈/G1 on G1 and 0 on G2, then g∈Hol(T) with g(T)=2πi1∫Γz−Tg(z)dz,where Γ⊂G1, and F1⊆InsΓ. Then E1(T−λ)E1g(T)E1=E1g(T)E1(T−λ)E1=E1,put A=E1g(T)∣X1, then (T1−λ)A=A(T1−λ)=IX1, so λ∈ρ(T1). Hence σ(T1)⊆F1. Moreover, σ(T1)∪σ(T2)=σ(T)=F1∪F2, so σ(Ti)=Fi.
□
Theo.φ is a positive linear functional on A, then there is a cyclic representation (π,H) st φ(a)=⟨π(a)e,e⟩.
证明. When A=C(X) for compact X, then φ(f)=∫Xfdμ. Let H=L2(μ)= the completion of C(X)/L where L={f∈C(X):∫X∣f∣2dμ=0},⟨[f],[g]⟩=∫Xfgˉdμ.More generally, let H be the completion of A/L where L={x∈A:φ(x∗x)=0},⟨[x],[y]⟩=φ(y∗x).Let π be the operator on A/L such that π(a)[x]=[ax], then as ∥π(a)∥≤∥a∥, π(a) can be extended as an operator on H. Let e=[1], then π(A)e=A/L is by definition dense in H, and ⟨π(a)e,e⟩=⟨[a],[1]⟩=φ(a).Suppose that (π′,H′) is another representation. Let U:π(A)e→π′(A)e′,π(a)e↦π′(a)e′.Extend the isometry U to H→H′, then Uπ(a)π(x)e=Uπ(ax)e=π′(ax)e′=π′(a)π′(x)e′=π′(a)Uπ(x)e,so Uπ(a)=π′(a)U.
□
证明. Let K(a,b)=φ(b∗a), then K is positive definite, i.e. i,j∑αiαˉjK(bi,bj)≥0.Write Ka(b)=K(a,b), and F=span{Ka}, and define the inner product (where f=∑iαiKbi) [f,f]=i,j∑αiαˉjK(bi,bj).Note that φ((af)∗(af))=φ(f∗a∗af)≤φ(f∗∥a∥2f)=∥a∥2φ(f∗f).Therefore, if we let π(a) be the operator on F st π(a)(i∑αiKbi)=i∑αiKabi,then as [i∑αiKbi,i∑αiKbi]=i,j∑αiαˉjφ(bi,bj)=φ(f∗f),and consequently [i∑αiKabi,i∑αiKabi]=φ((af)∗af)≤∥a∥2φ(f∗f)=∥a∥2[i∑αiKbi,i∑αiKbi],π is a bounded operator and can thus be extended as an operator on H, the completion of F under its inner product. It is trivial to see that π(ab)=π(a)π(b), and [i∑αiKabi,j∑βiKcj]=i,j∑αiβˉjφ(cj∗abi)=i,j∑αiβˉjφ((a∗cj)∗bi)=[i∑αiKbi,j∑βjKa∗cj]gives π∗(a)=π(a∗). Finally, [π(a)Ke,Ke]=K(a,e)=φ(a).
□
Theo. If X is compact Hausdorff and ρ:C(X)→B(H) is a C∗-homo that maps 1 to I, then there exists a unique spectral measure (E,H) st π(f)=∫fdEand (i) π is injective iff for all nonempty open V, E(V)=0, (ii) Sπ(f)=π(f)S iff SE(ω)=E(ω)S.
证明. For given x,y∈H, by Riesz we have a complex regular Borel measure μx,y st ⟨π(f)x,y⟩=∫fdμx,yand (i) μx,y=μˉy,x, (ii) ∥μx,y∥≤∥x∥∥y∥. Then there is an operator π~(φ) for every bounded Borel function φ st ⟨π~(φ)x,y⟩=∫φdμx,y.From ∫fgdμx,y=⟨π(fg)x,y⟩=⟨π(f)π(g)x,y⟩=∫fdμπ(g)x,ywe get gdμx,y=dμπ(g)x,y. And from ∫φgdμx,y=⟨π~(φ)π(g)x,y⟩=⟨π(g)x,π~(φ)y⟩=∫gdμx,π~∗(φ)ywe get φdμx,y=dμx,π~∗(φ)y. Then ∫φψdμx,y=∫ψdμx,π~∗(φ)y=⟨π~(ψ)x,π~∗(φ)y⟩=⟨π~(φψ)x,y⟩,so π~(φψ)=π~(φ)π~(ψ). And (i) implies π~∗(φ)=π~(φˉ). Therefore π~ is a C∗-extension of π from C(X) to bounded Borel functions.
Now define E(ω)=π~(χω). Easy to check that E(∅)=0,E(X)=I,E(ω1∩ω2)=E(ω1)E(ω2), and ∥∥E(ω)x−i=1∑nE(ωi)x∥∥2=⟨E(ω∖∪i=1nωi)x,x⟩=μx,x(ω∖∪i=1nωi)x,x)→0.As ⟨E(ω)x,y⟩=⟨π~(χω)x,y⟩=∫χωdμx,y=μx,y(ω),we have ⟨π(f)x,y⟩=∫fdμx,y=∫fdEx,y.(i) If E(V)=0 for some nonempty open V, then for continuous function f=0 supported on V, π(f)=∫fdE=0, so π is not injective.
If π is not injective, then the closed ideal kerπ is of the form {f:f∣S=0}. Pick an open U∩S=∅, then a continuous function g≥0 supported on U belongs to kerπ, so ∫gdE=π(g)=0, implying E(U)=0.
(ii) Note that ⟨Sπ(f)x,y⟩=⟨π(f)Sx,y⟩⇔∫fdEx,S∗y=∫fdESx,yand ⟨SE(ω)x,y⟩=⟨E(ω)Sx,y⟩⇔Ex,S∗y(ω)=ESx,y(ω),so Sπ(f)=π(f)S iff SE(ω)=E(ω)S for each ω.
□
Theo.N={N1,⋯,Nm} is a set of commuting normal operators, generating with I a closed self–adjoint subalgebra C∗(N). Let M be the maximal ideal space of C∗(N), then τ:M→Δ⊂Cm,φ↦(φ(N1),⋯,φ(Nm))is a homeomorphism, so π:C(Δ)→C∗(N),f(z1,⋯,zm)↦(f(N1),⋯,f(Nm))is a C∗-isomorphism. There is unique spectral measure (E,H) on Δ st Nk=∫ΔzkdE,k=1,⋯,m,and (i) T commutes with each Nk iff TE(ω)=E(ω)T, (ii) each E(ω) is a reduced subspace for each Nk, (iii) Nkh=λkh for some h=0 iff E({(λ1,⋯,λm)})=0.
证明. We have established that there exists (E,H) on Δ st Nk=∫ΔzkdE. Then p(N1,N1∗,⋯,Nm,Nm∗)=∫Δp(z1,zˉ1,⋯,zm,zˉm)dE,for any polynomial p, and hence for continuous functions.
(i) is by (ii) above, (ii) is due to E(ω)Nk=NkE(ω), and (iii) is by (i) above.
□
Theo. Let N be a normal operator, then there is a spectral measure E defined on the Borel subsets of σ(N) st for f∈C(σ(N)), f(N)=∫σ(N)zdE(z)with: (i) λ is an eigenvalue of N iff E({λ})=0; (ii) TN=NT iff TE(ω)=E(ω)T for all Borel ω.
证明. (i) For eigenvalue λ, write Nx=λx. Let fn(z)={1/(λ−z),0,z∈/B1/n(λ),z∈B1/n(λ).Then E(C∖B1/n(λ))x=fn(N)(λ−N)x=0,letting n→∞ gives E(C∖{λ})x=0, i.e. E({λ})x=x.
(ii) By Fuglede, TN∗=N∗T, so Tp(N,N∗)=p(N,N∗)T for any polynomial, and subsequently Tf(N)=f(N)T for any f∈C(σ(N)), and therefore TE(ω)=E(ω)T for any open set ω by taking a sequence of nonnegative continuous fn↗1ω, and ultimately for any Borel ω. For the converse, approximate z by simple functions.
□
Theo. If {Ut} is a weakly continuous one parameter unitary group, then there is unique spectral measure (P,H) st Ut=∫Re−istdP(s).
Theo. Let A be a self–adjoint algebra of B(H) with Av=0⇒v=0. Let As and Aw be the strong and weak closures of A. Then As=Aw=A′′.
证明. Clearly As⊆Aw⊆A′′, since if there is a sequence of {Ai} in A st ⟨Aix,y⟩→⟨Ax,y⟩, then it follows from ⟨ASx,y⟩←⟨AiSx,y⟩=⟨SAix,y⟩→⟨SAx,y⟩ that AS=SA for all S∈A′. Then it suffices to show that every operator B∈A′′ can be strongly approximated by operators in A; that is, to find A∈A st k=1∑n∥(B−A)hk∥<ε.
Consider first the case n=1, and let P be the projection onto Ah. Since for all A∈A we have AAh⊂Ah and A(Ah⊥)⊂Ah⊥, AP=PA so P∈A′. Next observe that h∈Ah, for A(I−P)h=(I−P)Ah=0 implies (I−P)h=0. Now BP=PB implies Bh=BPh=PBh∈Ah.
Then consider the case n≥2. Let Hn=H⊕⋯⊕H be the direct sum of n copies of H, and let h=(h1,⋯,hn). And let An=A⊕⋯⊕A and Bn=B⊕⋯⊕B, then simple calculation indicates that (An)′={(Tij):Tij∈A′} and that (An)′′=(A′′)n. So Bnh∈(An)′′h=Anh.